That means lectures are the lowest, least-efficient, least-effective form of learning. It is the lowest, least-efficient, least-effective form of learning. These aren't anything more than an off-the-top-of-my-head list, so please don't think of them as The Complete Story! And yes, I'm way overgeneralizing, or this would be book-length.)ġ) Know the difference between "listening" and "learning". (A list of reference links is at the very bottom of the post. This is for newbies, so I'm sure I have nothing new to say for those of you who are already experienced teachers/trainers. There are two different lists here-Eleven Things to Know, and Ten Tips for New Trainers. The fundamentals of how humans learn are pretty constant, even if the application of those fundamentals can look quite different on the surface). So this is my starter list for new trainers and teachers (I won't debate any distinctions between "teaching" and "training"-we're talking about one who designs and/or delivers learning experiences, so I don't care what you call it, what your subject is, or even how old your learners are. that just going on instinct and winging it would be enough. The irony is that most people with this attitude would themselves be insulted if the tables were turned-if their students didn't think they needed to learn anything from them. People can be self-taught, and do a fabulous job, for a fraction of the cost of a formal education, but they have to be motivated and they have to appreciate why it's important. Just as there are plenty of great software developers and programmers without a CompSci degree. That because you've experienced learning, you can craft a learning experience.īut with that out of the way, nobody needs a PhD (or in most cases - any degree at all) in education or learning theory to be a good teacher. It devalues the art of teaching to think that because you've been a student, you can teach well. I'm amazed (and more than a little disheartened) how many people believe that simply by virtue of their being skilled and knowledgeable in something, they're implicitly qualified to communicate, mentor, teach, or train that thing. And just because you've logged a million frequent flyer miles doesn't mean you can fly a plane.īut if that's all ridiculously obvious, why do some people believe that just because they've taken classes, they can teach? (Or just because they've read lots of books, they can write one?) The problem isn't thinking that they can do it, the problem is thinking they can do it without having to learn, study, or practice. Just because you've been in lots of buildings doesn't mean you can be an architect. Just because you've used lots of software doesn't mean you can write code. Why I want a tablet PC (hint: mind mapping).Stop your presentation before it kills again!.The case for easter eggs and other user treats.Subvert from within: a user-focused guide.Conversational writing kicks formal writing's ass.Ultra-fast release cycles and the new plane. ![]() Angry/negative people can be bad for your brain.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |